Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 Ark. 439

Williams v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1889

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1889-11-15

John A. Williams, Judge. J. M. Cunningham brought this suit against Robert Williams and Caswell Bunting to recover the amount of a promissory note executed by Bunting, and to enforce a lien on 5300 pounds of seed cotton, which it is alleged defendant, Williams, converted to his own use, with knowledge of the lien.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1889-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1956

6 state decisions

3018891890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶11. Leins: On future property. It is the result of all the authorities, that wherever the parties by their contract intend to create a positive lien or charge, either upon real or personal property, whether then owned by the assignor or contractor or not, or ¡f personal property, whether it is then in esse, it attaches in equity as a lien or charge upon the particular property, as soon as the assignor or contractor acquires a title thereto, against the latter, and all persons asserting a claim thereto, under him, either voluntarily, or with notice by record. Jones on Chattel Mortgages, sec. 133; Mitchell v. Winslow, 2 Story, 630; Bell v. Pelt, 51 Ark., 433.

¶22. Same. There was no evidence as to the value of the mortgaged cotton received by appellant; but he alleged in his answer that he had received therefor $103. It is evident that Cunningham lost the benefit of his lien on the cotton through the appropriation thereof by Williams to his own use. The court should-have rendered judgment for the $103, and interest thereon from the date of the filing of the complaint at the rate of 6 per cent., per annum.

¶3The decree to that extent will be modified.

Cockrill, C. J., did not sit in this case.
/52/ark/439 · .json · Public domain