In Re Hoffman’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2015
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1124 · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Johnson v. First National Bank · Prudential Insurance v. Monnier · Martin v. United States · Clarkson Clarkson v. Cooke Sales and Service Co · Hulm First Federal Savings Loan Association of Bismarck Inc v. Hulm First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Bismarck Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court is allowed to confirm a plan under section 1129(b) if it determines that the plan does not discriminate unfairly, is fair and equitable with respect to each class of impaired claims or interests which have not accepted the plan, and all provisions of section 1129(a) except for paragraph (8) have been met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.