52 Cal. 203
Decided July 1, 1877
California Supreme Court · decided 1877-07-01
On the 18th day of February, 1869, McLaughlin entered into a contract with Fowler to sell him the west half and the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter, and the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter, and the west half and the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter, and the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section seventeen, township three north of range six east of Mount Diablo base and meridian, containing, according to the United States…
Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1887
Relies on Cent. Pac. R.R. v. Yolland
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1877-07-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The determination of this case depends upon the proper construction of certain statutes of the United States. The precise question presented has been passed upon by the Supreme Court of the United States, in Newhall v. Sanger, 92 U. S. R. 761. Newhall v. Sangeroverrules Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Yolland; Same v. Robinson, and Raiser v. McLaughlin, 49 Cal. 438, 446, 449.
¶2Judgment and order affirmed.
¶3¡Neither Mr. Chief Justice Wallace nor Mr. Justice Rhodes -expressed an opinion.