Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Cal. 3d 65 - Rojo v. Kliger

52 Cal. 3d 65 - Rojo v. Kliger’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

666
cited by 666 later decisions
8
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 6 district · 513 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 666 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably 24 Cal. 4th 83 - Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc. (2000), 1 Cal. 4th 1083 - Gantt v. Sentry Insurance (1992)

50 federal appellate · 6 district · 513 state decisions

2890199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · 47 Cal. 3d 654 - Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. · 43 Cal. 3d 1379 - Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission · 13 Cal. 3d 804 - Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 666 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The act expressly disclaims any intent to repeal other state laws relating to employment discrimination. Subdivision (a) of section 12993 provides: "The provisions of this part shall be construed liberally for the accomplishment of the purposes thereof. Nothing contained in this part shall be deemed to repeal any of the provisions of the Civil Rights Law or of any other law of this' state relating to discrimination because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, or age.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the public policy of the state that it is necessary to protect and safeguard the right and opportunity of all persons to seek, obtain, and hold employment without discrimination or abridgement”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “No extensive discussion is needed to establish the fundamental public interest in a workplace free from the pernicious influence of sexism.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.