Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 COLO 244 - People v. Orris

People v. Orris’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
December 1966
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1966

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

20191219201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. Schiffer · Farris v. Strong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A false pretense is such a fraudulent representation of an existing or past fact, by one who knows it not to be true, as is adapted to induce, the person to whom it is -made to part with something of value.” 11 R. C. L. 831.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.