Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 CONN 404 - Buckingham v. Hurd

Buckingham v. Hurd’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 1997

14 state decisions

40188418901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “liable where any article purchased by either shall have in fact gone to the support of the family, or for the Joint benefit of both, or for the reasonable apparel of the wife, or for her reasonable support while abandoned by her husband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.