Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 CONNAPP 292 - Weyel v. Catania

Weyel v. Catania’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably State v. Smith (2002), Wallerstein v. Stew Leonard's Dairy (2001)

31 state decisions

2101999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Graham v. Connor · Bell v. Wolfish · Blum v. Stenson · Farrar v. Hobby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defense of qualified immunity shields government officials from civil liability if the official's conduct did not violate constitutional rights that were clearly established at the pertinent time or if it was objectively reasonable for the official to believe that the conduct did not violate such rights. . . . As a general rule, police officers are entitled to qualified immunity if (1) their conduct does not violate clearly established constitutional rights, or (2) it was objectively reasonable for them to believe their acts did not violate those rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A motion to disqualify a judicial officer because of the claimed possibility of bias is a serious matter. If counsel makes such a motion, it is not asking too much to require that he or she follow the established rules that treat it as such.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “1. the severity of the crime at issue; 2. whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officer or others; and 3. whether the suspect is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.