Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.1d 795 - In re Haskell

In re Haskell’s Empirical Analysis

52 F. 795 · 1892

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
April 1936
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1936

3 federal appellate ·

2018921900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Barbier v. Connolly · Soon Hing v. Crowley · Kearney · Caldwell v. State of Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is apparent from section 755 that, if it appears from the petition itself that the relator is not entitled to his discharge, the court should deny his petition without issuing the writ.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.