Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.2d 142 - Hill v. Gratigny Plateau Development Corp.

Hill v. Gratigny Plateau Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

52 F.2d 142 · 1931

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1968
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Willard v. Wood · Briggs v. . Partridge · Ballas v. Lake Weir Light & Water Co. · Schaefer v. . Henkel · Lente v. Clarke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * Looking at the whole instrument, we think it sufficiently appears upon its face to have been the intent of the parties to bind the corporation and not to personally bind R.L. Martin and Lucile Potter, and we so hold."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.