Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.2d 476 - Knapp v. Callaway

Knapp v. Callaway’s Empirical Analysis

52 F.2d 476 · 1931

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
March 1972
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 1972

4 federal appellate · 3 district ·

5019311940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Waite v. Macy · Lynch v. Tilden Produce Co. · A. O. Andersen & Co. v. United States · Commercial Solvents Corp. v. Mellon · United States v. Two Hundred Cases of Adulterated Tomato Catsup

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “filthy, decomposed, or putrid animal or vegetable substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.