Busch v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.2d 79 · 1931
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 1983 · most notably Hewitt v. United States (1940), Holmes v. United States (1943)
31 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Trenton Potteries Co. · United States v. Solomon Kenofskey · Van Riper v. United States · Cochran v. United States · Robinson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While the scheme or artifice must be sufficiently set forth so as to advise the de fendants with the particulars thereof, yet the scheme need not be set forth with that particularity which would be required if the scheme was the gist of the offense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.