McCormick & Co. v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.2d 934 · 1931
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1972
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 27 U.S.C. § 121 (Wilson Act) · 27 U.S.C. § 122 (Webb-Kenyon Act) · 27 U.S.C. § 123 · 28 U.S.C. § 41
Relies on Packard v. Banton · Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. · Glenwood Light Water Company v. Mutual Light Heat & Power Company · Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Russell · McNeill v. Southern Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An interlocutory or permanent injunction restraining the enforcement, operation or execution of any State statute by restraining the action of any officer of such State in the enforcement or execution of such statute or of an order made by an administrative board or commission acting under State statutes, shall not be granted by any district court or judge thereof upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of such statute unless the application therefor is heard and determined by a district court of three judges under section 2284 of this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.