Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.2d 946 - Rector v. Suncrest Lumber Co.

Rector v. Suncrest Lumber Co.’s Empirical Analysis

52 F.2d 946 · 1931

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
August 2000
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2000

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

7019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Swift & Co. v. United States · Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum · McGowan v. Parish · Nashville St Ry Co v. United States · Union Pacific Railroad v. Public Service Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rector paid the larger amount under an agreement of settlement, and afterwards consented to a judgment wherein it was recited that all matters in controversy between the parties had been fully compromised and settled, the foreclosure sale to the company was declared null and void, and the suit dismissed. Such a judgment precluded further litigation of the issue, for a judgment entered by consent is as conclusive and final as to any matter determined as one rendered in invitum after contest and trial. [citing cases] And such a judgment cannot be impeached collaterally in another proceeding, [citing cases].””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The effect of the judgment was to put an end to all litigation between the parties upon the questions determined in the earlier case, and these included the very essence of the present controversy. * * * Such a judgment precluded further litigation of the issue, for a judgment entered by consent is as conclusive and final as to any matter determined as one rendered in invitum after contest and trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.