Gorlikowski v. Tolbert’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.3d 1439 · 1995
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Knox v. State of Indiana (1996), Rios v. Bigler (1995)
26 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McNabola v. Chicago Transit Authority · Avitia v. Metropolitan Club of Chicago, Inc. · Mayer v. Gary Partners & Co. · Burdett v. Miller · McGinnis v. Ingram Equipment Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether there is a reasonable basis in the record for the verdict.... If this test is met, we will not reweigh the evidence but will let the verdict stand.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[b]ecause the parties rely on the pretrial conference to inform them precisely what is in controversy, the pretrial order is treated as superceding the pleadings and establishes the issues to be considered at trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is to clarify the real nature of the dispute at issue[;] a claim or theory not raised in the pretrial order should not be considered by the fact-finder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.