Doe v. Roe No. 1, and Roe No. 2’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.3d 151 · 1995
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Bank Leumi Le-Israel v. Lee · Holland v. Jefferson National Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person being under legal disabilities when the cause of action accrues may bring his action within two (2) years after the disability is removed.” Indiana Code § 1-1-4-5(21) (1992) defined”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“actions by parents which result in injuries to their children, not omissions by parents which allow injuries to occur.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. LaCava v. LaCava“a parent is part of the 'dynamics' which allows the abuse to occur or who is in collusion with the actual perpetrator.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. LaCava v. LaCava
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.