Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.3d 165 - United States v. Eicke

United States v. Eicke’s Empirical Analysis

52 F.3d 165 · 1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 2009
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3562 · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3614 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on United States v. McGee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[rjeminding [defendant] that he still owes the United States this money [under the fine obligation imposed as a part of his supervised release] is not akin to imposing a new fine” and consequently”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.