Box v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.3d 168 · 1995
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably Johnson v. Chater (1996), Threet v. Barnhart (2003)
12 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Matthews v. Shalala · 17805a Keeton v. Department of Health and Human Services · Cook v. Bowen · Edwards v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the additional evidence is (a) new, (b) material, and (c) relate[d] to the period on or before the date of the ALJ's decision.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“additional and significant work-related limitation of function”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is supported by substantial evidence on the entire record.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sird v. Chater · Lewis v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.