United States v. Hove’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.3d 233 · 1995
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably Roy v. Gomez (1996), United States v. Earthy D. Daniels, Jr. (1996)
15 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322
Relies on Griffith v. Kentucky · Bourjaily v. United States · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Ratzlaf et Ux United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hether a reasonable jury could conclude that [the defendant] heard, understood, and would have responded to the statements if he were innocent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.