Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 F.3d 320

Docket No. 94-2152.

Comer v. Enser Operations

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 4, 1995. Decided: April 26, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-04-26

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-04-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Penn-America Insurance v. Mapp (2006), 139 F. Supp. 3d 742 - Norris v. Excel Industries, Inc. (2015)

22 federal appellate ·

220199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-317-2)

Eben C. Comer, Warren R. Hodges, Appellants Pro Se. Paul Bernard Lindemann, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Greenville, SC; Robert E. Douglas, DOUGLAS, HAMRICK, HARPOLD & STRAUB, Charleston, WV; David L. Gordon, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Atlanta, GA, for Appellees.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellee in a wrongful discharge action brought pursuant to the court's diversity jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Comer v. ENSR Operations, No. CA-93-317-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 5, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/52/f3d/320 · .json · Public domain