Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 F.3d 321

Docket No. 95-6147.

Clifton Footes, Jr. v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 15, 1995. Decided: April 12, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-04-12

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently November 1997 · most notably Stieberger v. Apfel (1997), Milton McCray v. Bishop L. Robinson, Secretary J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General William L. Smith, Warden (1995)

29 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clifton Footes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Footes v. Smith, No. CA-93-3925-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/52/f3d/321 · .json · Public domain