Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 F.3d 322

Docket No. 94-1994.

Charles E. Tyler, Jr. v. Wesley C. McClure Eddie Moore, Jr., President, Virginia State University Clarence Muse Thomas Hall

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued: April 5, 1995. Decided: April 26, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-04-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Long C

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-04-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

ARGUED: Robert Patrick Geary, Richmond, VA, for Appellant. Richard Croswell Kast, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, William H. Hurd, Deputy Attorney General, Paul J. Forch, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In his civil action premised on 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1983 (West 1994), Charles E. Tyler, Jr. (Tyler), a Virginia State University (VSU) campus police officer, appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Eddie N. Moore, Jr. and Leslie C. McClure, the president and former president of VSU, and Clarence Muse and Thomas Hall, the director and former director of Safety and Security for VSU. Tyler's civil action was based on his allegations that the defendants took various adverse employment actions against him in retaliation for his cooperation with an external grand jury investigation into alleged mismanagement of VSU Foundation funds, all in violation of his right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment. See U.S. Const. amend. I. Upon careful review of the record, the parties' arguments, and the district court's lengthy order, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tyler v. McClure, No. 3:93-CV-832 (E.D. Va. May 4, 1994).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/52/f3d/322 · .json · Public domain