United States v. Mortimer’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.3d 429 · 1995
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably United States v. Broughton-Jones (1995), United States v. Zichettello (2000)
35 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)
Relies on United States v. Bass · United States v. Broce · Lane v. Peterson · Adair v. United States · Neshewat v. Hagstrom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even an indigent defendant may be subject to the duty to pay restitution when and if funds are eventually acquired.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affirmative act or statement allowing an inference”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“financial resources of the defendant[ and] the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant's dependents,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.