Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.3d 475 - Luck v. Mazzone

Luck v. Mazzone’s Empirical Analysis

52 F.3d 475 · 1995

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably Daley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. (1999), Lewis v. Cowen (1999)

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

250199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Rankin v. McPherson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such property interests are 'created and their dimensions are defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “lacked state civil-service tenure or any other formal employment guarantee that would have given her a cognizable property interest in her job”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An interest that state law permits to be terminated at the whim of another person is not a property right that is protected by the Due Process Clause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.