In Re Wildewood Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2012
4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bayer · Tiller v. NCNB Bank · Shibuya v. Voss · Gairola v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of General Services · Bristol Steel Iron Works Incorporated v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question is whether a jury, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to [Appellees], could have properly reached the conclusion reached by this jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“substantial and unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.