United States v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
52 F.3d 521 · 1995
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2024
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Moore v. United States · Peretz v. United States · Baumgart v. Fairchild Aircraft Corp. · United States v. Sanchez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether a reasonable jury could conclude that the evidence presented, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, established the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“control and authority over the funds in the usual course of routine banking transactions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ll crimes of embezzlement involve an unlawful act at some point.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.