Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.3d 828 - United States v. Okane

United States v. Okane’s Empirical Analysis

52 F.3d 828 · 1995

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
March 2011
most recently cited

43 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably United States v. Collins (1997), United States v. Davis (1995)

43 federal appellate ·

360199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Stinson v. United States · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Soberon v. United States · Williams v. United States · Granito v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[I]nstead of hypothesizing a criminal history range more than VI, the guidelines require a sentencing court to look to the other axis and consider the available ranges from higher offense levels.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “to determine whether the district court properly identified the existence of appropriate circumstances warranting a departure.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'ascertain whether the circumstances cited by the district court to justify departure actually exist in the instant case.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.