Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.3d 901 - International Surplus Lines Insurance v. Wyoming Coal Refining Systems, Inc.

International Surplus Lines Insurance v. Wyoming Coal Refining Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

52 F.3d 901 · 1995

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
4
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 29 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Hill III v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation Do M W (2004), Boling v. Romer (1996)

20 federal appellate · 29 district · 6 state decisions

2801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Applied Genetics International, Inc. v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc. · Pasternak v. Lear Petroleum Exploration, Inc. · The Building And Construction Department v. Rockwell International Corporation · No. 92-4084

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[M]ere assertion that discovery is incomplete or that specific facts necessary to oppose summary judgment are unavailable is insufficient.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “state with specificity why extra time is needed and how the additional time and material will rebut the summary judgment motion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.