Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 F.4th 51 - Sabir v. Williams

Sabir v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C

Relies on Pearson v. Callahan · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Hunter v. Bryant · Cutter et al. v. Wilkinson Director Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the plaintiff is entitled to all reasonable inferences from the facts alleged, not only those that support his claim, but also those that defeat the immunity defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Usually, the defense of qualified immunity cannot support the grant of a [Rule] 12(b)(6) motion for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.