Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 Fla. 663

Sweetser v. Ladd

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1906

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1906-06-15

This case was decided by Division A. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1906-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1932

3 state decisions

101906191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1Mrs. Abbie R. Dodge, a childless widow died in Jacksonville on the 28th day of Mrch, 1904. By a will executed January 22, 1903, after making specific bequests to various relatives she devised the rest of her large estate, which she had acquired chiefly if not wholly by her own efforts to A. M3. McDonald who had been for several years the pastor of her church. The will was executed in proper form and was duly probated by the County Judge of Duval county, Florida. A petition was filed by certain of her heirs praying the revocation of the will, alleging that the testatrix was mentally incapable of executing a will and that the will was procured by the undue influence of MacDonald. Voluminous evidence was taken upon the issues thus raised and the County Judge denied the petition. An appeal was taken to the Circuit Court for the Fourth Judicial Circuit, and this action was affirmed. The contestants thereupon appealed to this court and pray a reversal of both courts.

¶2*665Irrespective of where the burden of proof may lie in such cases and blotting out the fact that two capable judges, who are probably well acquainteed with the majority of the witnesses in the case, one of whom had them before him, have separately upheld the will as against the assaults made upon it, we are confident, after a most careful study of the record, not only that Mrs. Dodge had at the time of making the will the requisite mental capacity, but that her mind was above the average in strength and clearness and that she was not unduly influenced by Mr. MacDonald. For the courts to set aside a will upon the facts in this record would be to unduly impair the power given by the Legislature to make wills.

¶3We find no reversible error in the admission or rejection of evidence. A broad, in fact a too liberal, latitude was allowed the contestants in the introduction of their evidence, but as to this they can not complain.

¶4Had the courts found other than they did, we would have felt called upon to interfere, but as they found correctly, the decree of the Circuit Court, affirming the order or decree of the County Judge is itself affirmed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur.Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.
/52/fla/663 · .json · Public domain