Latimer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1976
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 901 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board · 10 Wash. 2d 585 - Cowiche Growers, Inc. v. Bates · Jones v. Gaylord Guernsey Farms · Chester C. Fosgate Co. v. United States · Stuart v. Kleck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“plowing, discing, planting, cultivating, irrigating, root cutting, spraying, pruning, dusting, fumigating, and other cultural and maintenance labor.” The 'court there said at page 234:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“under title 9 of the social security act.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“incident to ordinary farming operations,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.