Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 FSUPP2D 178 - In Re Centennial Technologies Litigation

In Re Centennial Technologies Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
December 2006
most recently cited

4 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78B (§ 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Central Bank of Denver Na v. First Interstate Bank of Denver Na K · American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp. · Cadle Co. v. Hayes · Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Erie Lackawanna, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defendant] asserts that ... the reasoning behind Central Bank forbids holding [it] liable under status-based [agent] liability principles. I anticipate that the First Circuit, when and if it addresses this issue, will not reach the outcomes proposed by [defendant]....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the alleged control person actually exercise[ ] control over the general operations of the primary violator ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.