52 F. Supp. 2d 34 - Campbell v. Clinton’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 2 U.S.C. § 691 · 50 U.S.C. § 1541 · 50 U.S.C. § 1543 · 50 U.S.C. § 1544 · 50 U.S.C. § 1545 · 50 U.S.C. § 1547
Relies on Baker v. Carr · Allen v. Wright · Powell v. McCormack · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the separation of powers considerations previously evaluated under the rubric of ripeness or equitable or remedial discretion now are subsumed in the standing analysis”). 21 . The Ethics Committee was known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct during the 111th Congress — i.e., when Lof-gren was Chair. See 111th Cong. Comm. Rules at 247. 22 . Note, though, that Rangel does not identify any specific Rules violated by defendants, referencing only the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced ... into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“on March 24, 1999, U.S. military forces, at my direction ... began a series of air strikes in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.