52 F. Supp. 2d 522 - In Re Richards’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2073 · 48 U.S.C. § 1611 · 48 U.S.C. § 1613A
Relies on Hanna v. Plumer · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Grosso v. United States · Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa · Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any aggrieved litigant or attorney may petition the Presiding Judge in writing for administrative resolution of any matter involving observance by judges or other judicial personnel of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure or the prompt dispatch of the Court’s business ... Upon receipt of the petition, the Presiding Judge shall review the matter and take such administrative action as is deemed appropriate....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is in good faith, in the public interest, and in the interest of justice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the United States attorney may by leave of court file a dismissal of an indictment, information or complaint and the prosecution shall thereupon terminate,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.