Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 INDAPP 11 - Miller v. Sharp

Miller v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 1988

18 state decisions

7019121920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tilley v. County of Cook · Carr v. Duval · Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Reynolds · Quinnin v. Reimers · Board of Commissioners v. Shipley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An acceptance, to be good, must, of course, be such as to conclude an agreement or contract between the parties. And to do this it must in every respect meet and correspond with the offer neither falling within nor going beyond the terms proposed, but exactly meeting them at all points, and closing with them just as they stand.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.