52 Kan. App. 2d 737 - State v. Hendricks’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Coman · State v. James · State v. Williams · McCain v. McCain · Hardenburger v. Hardenburger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A divorce action combines several claims-potentially for child support, child custody, parenting time, maintenance, and property division-into a single cause of action. Unless some of those are left undecided, the divorce decree is a final judgment. See McCain v. McCain , 219 Kan. 780 , 549 P.2d 896 (1976) (holding that divorce rulings are final and appealable only when court has both granted divorce and resolved all other issues in the case, such as child custody and property division)." State v. Hendricks , 52 Kan. App. 2d 737 , 739, 372 P.3d 437 (2016).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Biehl v. Vandeloecht“appealable judgment even though the court necessarily retains jurisdiction to enter orders of modification related to any children”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Biehl v. Vandeloecht
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.