Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 KANAPP2D 891 - State v. Webb

State v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Abney v. United States · In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · State v. Anderson · Ex Parte Robinson · State v. Freeman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he absence of any express statutory authority for an interlocutory appeal by a criminal defendant, the general rule that there is no judgment in a criminal case until conviction and sentencing, [and] the related assumption in several cases that a criminal defendant has no right to an interlocutory appeal, and the United States Supreme Court's holding in Flanagan that a trial court's disqualification of defense counsel in a criminal case does not qualify as an immediately appealable order under the collateral order doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any decision of the district court or intermediate order made in the progress of the case may be reviewed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “from any judgment against the defendant in the district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.