Commonwealth v. DiMarzio’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · Johnson v. United States · Welsh v. Wisconsin · Illinois v. Charles McArthur · Fearance v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). The defendant makes no other argument that the police lacked reasonable ground to believe that an emergency existed or that their actions were unreasonable in the circumstances. The police tracked her location using CSLI for a brief period, apparently not exceeding two hours, and intercepted her immediately after hearing her say, in a second phone call, that she was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t was reasonable for the police to go looking for the defendant to gather further information”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.