Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 MD 592 - Estep v. Mackey

Estep v. Mackey’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2018

7 state decisions

20187918801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must clearly appear from the language used in the various parts of the will; and, unless the intent is clearly and certainly different from that which the technical language he has used may import, we must adhere to their technical signification, and give effect to the will accordingly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was not in being and could not have been intended,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.