Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 MICH 304 - Persinger v. Jubb

Persinger v. Jubb’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 1915
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1915

6 state decisions

401883189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that as administratrix she was not concerned; but she was widow with a right of dower, and she was also guardian for the two minor heirs. If she had described herself as guardian, the right would have been apparent. But we are inclined to regard the misdescription as a mere informality.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.