Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 NC 64 - Smithwick v. . Ward

Smithwick v. . Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1859

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
June 1956
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1956

5 state decisions

4018591860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This element, in the estimate of (477) damages, is allowed, to punish the defendants for violating the laws, and by making them smart , to deter others as well as themselves from similar violations. The principle upon which society acts in punishing criminally is precisely the same. The public never is actuated by revenge, but solely by a motive of self-protection, and punishes to prevent a repetition of the offense by the culprit, or its perpetration by others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.