Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 Neb. 314

Boyd v. Mains

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1897

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1897-09-22

<p>Review: Assignments op Error. An assignment in a petition in error “errors of law occurring at the trial” presents nothing to this court for review.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1899

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1897-09-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ragan, C.

¶1This is an error proceeding to review a decree in equity of the district court of Pierce county.

¶2*3151. We notice only two assignments in the petition in error. The first is that the decree of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence. We have carefully examined the evidence, and, without setting it or any part of it out here, it must suffice to say that it amply sustains the decree.

¶32. A second assignment of error is “errors of law occurring at the trial.” Such an assignment as this presents no question to this court for review. (See Fremont, E. & M. V. R. Co. v. Root, 49 Neb., 900, and cases there cited.) The judgment of the district court is

¶4Affirmed."

Harrison, J., not sitting.
/52/neb/314 · .json · Public domain