Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 NH 182 - Bryant v. Osgood

Bryant v. Osgood’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
4
states following
December 1950
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1950

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

30187218801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Odiorne v. Colley · Young v. Walker · Chadbourne v. Sumner · Scott v. Manchester Print Works · Dunklee v. Fales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “•‘The provision is not that the attachment may be made, as in case of real estate, by leaving a copy. Rev. Stat. c. 184, § 3; Kittredge v. Bellows, 7 N. H. 427 . Indeed, no attempt is made to change the mode of making the attachment, but a new and easier method of preserving it is provided. Before this statute there was not so much difficulty in making as in preserving attachments of the various articles enumerated in the fourteenth section of chapter 184. Hemmenway v. Wheeler, 14 Pick. (Mass.) 410 [ 25 Am. Dec. 411 ]; Sanderson v. Edwards, 16 Pick. (Mass.) 144 ; Reed v. Howard, 2 Metc. (Mass.) 38; Shepard v. Butterfield, 4 Cush. (Mass.) 425 [ 50 Am. Dec. 796 ]; Bicknell v. Trickey, 34 Me. 273 ; Miller v. Baker, 1 Metc. (Mass.) 32. As the statute has only provided a new mode of preserving attachments of the articles specified, it is still essential to a valid attachment of them that they should be taken into the possession or placed under the control of the officer. Odiorne v. Colley, 2 N. H. 66 [ 9 Am. Dec. 39 ]; Huntington v. Blaisdell, 2 N. H. 318 , 319; Chadbourne v. Sumner, 16 N. H. 132 [ 41 Am. Dec. 720 ].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Probably an attachment of real estate, by leaving a copy of a return expressed in such general terms, would be held sufficient, if the point were distinctly raised, on the ground that, since the law provides for the registration of land titles, a reference to the county records would disclose the precise property referred to in the officer's return, and id certum est, c.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.