State v. KAVANAUGH’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 8 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2002 · most notably Leis v. Flynt (1979), Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co. (1986)
6 federal appellate · 8 district · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Spevack v. Klein · United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. McJunkin Corp. · Hotel Employees Local No. 255 v. Leedom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The courts must take such steps by rule and regulation that will protect their processes from prejudicial outside interferences. Neither prosecutors, counsel for defense, the accused, witnesses, court staff nor enforcement officers coming under the jurisdiction of the court should be permitted to frustrate its function. Collaboration between counsel and the press as to information affecting the fairness of a criminal trial is not only subject to regulation, but is highly censurable and worthy of disciplinary measures.” (Emphasis added.) 384 U.S. 363 , 86 S.Ct. 1522 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Mister Baileys’ client’s urge a constitutional right to select an attorney who is not a member of our Bar. So long as the Bar of our State is able, willing and free to provide effective counsel, there is no such right.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Brock“incident to their broader responsibility for keeping the administration of justice and the standards of professional conduct unsullied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.