State Ex Rel. Prince v. Coors’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1977
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Peisker v. Chavez · In re Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co. · State Ex Rel. St. Louis, Rocky Mountain & Pacific Co. v. District Court of Eighth Judicial District · C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. Superior Court · 84 Cal. App. 2d 257 - Ralph v. Police Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is shown from the record that respondent has jurisdiction both of the subject matter and person. Thus having jurisdiction to determine the cause and render judgment, [certiorari] * * * cannot be used to supply the ordinary functions of an appeal or writ of error, nor may ..it be used to restrain. an inferior court from making an erroneous decision.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Morris v. Apodaca
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.