Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Ohio App. 2d 1 - State v. Craft

52 Ohio App. 2d 1 - State v. Craft’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

89 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably 102 Ohio App. 3d 758 - State v. Tichon (1995), 23 Ohio App. 3d 85 - Brooks v. Hurst Buick-Pontiac-Olds-Gmc, Inc. (1985)

89 state decisions

270197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville · United States v. Atkinson · State v. Perry · Weems v. United States · Rose v. Locke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an obvious error which is prejudicial to an accused, although neither objected to nor affirmatively waived, which, if allowed to stand, would have a substantial adverse impact on the integrity of and public confidence in judicial proceedings.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 52 Ohio App. 2d 53 - State v. Fischer · State v. Adkins
  2. “plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Ryan, Unpublished Decision (6-18-2004) · State v. Anderson, Unpublished Decision (3-12-2004)
  3. “How do we distinguish between a waived error and a plain error? More precisely, for this case, what are the guidelines to determine what prejudicial errors will or will not be deemed waived as a matter of law by defendant's failure to object at the trial level? Crim. R. 52(B) refers to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Phillips

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.