52 Ohio App. 2d 361 - State v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably State v. Broughton (1991), 70 Ohio App. 3d 624 - State v. Lewis (1990)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Barrett v. United States · Boesche v. Udall · Mann v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * [T]his court concludes that the proper method of computing time under R.C. 2945.71 is to include time pending trial under original indictment where a nolle prosequi has been entered on the original indictment or dismissed through fault of the prosecution. If the defendant is released without bail upon a dismissal of the original indictment, the defendant is not entitled to have time between the dismissal and the reindictment included under R.C. 2945.71, because during such period no charge is pending. * * *>>”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Effect of determination. If the court grants a motion to dismiss based on a defect in the institution of the prosecution or in the indictment, information, or complaint, it may also order that the defendant be held in custody or that his bail be continued for a specified time not exceeding fourteen days, pending the filing of a new indictment, information, or complaint. Nothing in this rule shall affect any statute relating to periods of limitations. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Broughton“{¶ 27} “The time within which an accused must be brought to trial * * * may be extended only by the following: {¶ 28} “ * * * {¶ 29} “(E) Any period of delay necessitated by reason of a * * * motion, proceeding, or action made or instituted by the accused; {¶ 30} “ * * * {¶ 31} “(H) The period of any continuance granted on the accused’s own motion, and the period of any reasonable continuance granted other than upon the accused’s own motion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kist
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.