52 Ohio App. 2d 59 - State v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Coleman (1988), Epperly v. Commonwealth (1982)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Orozco v. Texas · State v. White · State v. Kulig · 152 Ohio St. 6 - Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ninety-nine point nine-nine percentage range”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Strong v. State · Heald v. State““* * * The test as to the admissibility of the opinion of a doctor is as follows: “ * * [T]he witness must connect the two with reasonable medical certainty. Probability, and not possibility, is required. * * *’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he weight of authority holds that prior Miranda warnings are not required to validate consent searches, even when the consent is obtained after the defendant is effectively in custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.