Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Ohio App. 3d 36 - Gambert v. Huff

52 Ohio App. 3d 36 - Gambert v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1990
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dues v. Hodge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The limit of liability for uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage stated in the declarations as applicable to 'each person' is the limit of the company's liability for all damages for car or loss of services, because of bodily injury sustained by one person as the result of any one accident and, subject to the above provision respecting each person, the limit of liability stated in the declarations as applicable to 'each accident' is the total limit of the company's liability for all damages, including damages for care or loss of services, because of bodily injury sustained by two or more persons as the result of any one accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “*** An insurance policy provision that limits recovery for all causes of action arising out of bodily injury to one person to a single limit of liability is a valid restriction of uninsured motorist coverage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.