Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 Ohio Law. Abs. 64

State v. Sealock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1947

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1947-05-28

Decided 1947-05-28

¶1OPINION

By THE COURT

¶2Submitted on motion by the plaintiff-appellee for an order to dismiss this appeal for the reason that no briefs have been filed within the time required by law.

¶3The record discloses that the notice of appeal and transcript of docket and journal entries were filed January 29, 1947; that no brief nor assignments of error have been filed in this Court as required by §13459-3 GC, which provides in part as follows:

“… The krie:f 0j the appellant shall be filed with the transcript and shall contain the assignments of error relied on in such appeal … .”

¶4We, therefore, find that the defendant-appellant has failed to comply with this section of the General Code, the provisions of which are mandatory in criminal cases. See State v Jarcho, 65 Oh Ap 417. The motion to dismiss is sustained.

WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.
/52/ohiolawabs/64 · .json · Public domain