Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 OHIOST2D 43 - Jackson v. Coffey

Jackson v. Coffey’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2005

10 state decisions

401977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 142 Ohio St. 324 - State Ex Rel. Neffner v. Hummel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * (^) The koarc[ may affjrrri) disaffirm, or modify the decisions of the appointing authorities * * * and its decision is final.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Within ten days following the filing of such order, the employee may file an appeal, in writing, with the state personnel board of review * * *. In the event such an appeal is filed, the board * * * shall forthwith notify the appointing authority and shall hear, or appoint a trial board to hear, such appeal within thirty days from and after its filing with the board * * * and it may affirm, disaf-firm, or modify the judgment of the appointing authority.” This statute was rewritten in 1979 without a change in the words “affirm, disaffirm, or modify.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. ““Nowhere in R.C. Chapter 124 does such a rule or provision exist, and the board was in error to have employed it.” Id. at 46 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.